|
Prof. Motoshige Itoh
University of Tokyo
 |
Prof. Motoshige Itoh,
University of Tokyo |
Prof. Motoshige Itoh, University of Tokyo, addressed the meeting on the
perspective of the Japanese government regarding economic issues in the
Asia-Pacific region. Prof. Itoh noted that the previous day the Diet and
Cabinet had debated the TPP and a new international terminal had opened
at Tokyo International Airport, two issues that were related to the topic
at hand.
China surpassed Japan in terms of total GDP in 2010. Twenty years ago China
had a GDP one-eighth that of Japan. Ten years ago its GDP was one-third
of Japan's GDP. It is now projected that in ten years China will have a
GDP three times the size of Japan's and that in 20 years there will be
three other regions, excluding the United States, with larger GDPs. This
signals a very dramatic change in the economic geography of the Asia-Pacific
region, and can only mean that the area will become much more important
for Japan in the future.
Comparing the amount of Japan's GDP dependent on trade with similar statistics
from other nations, we can see that Japan is currently much less reliant
on outside sources of income than most other developed countries. 30% of
Japan's GDP comes from trade, compared to 72% of Germany's GDP. This can
be explained through what is known as the "gravity model of trade,"
which states that the total value of trade carried out by a country is
dependent on its distance from its largest trading partners. Germany has
always been near the economies of France, Italy, and the United Kingdom,
among others, leading to a high dependence on trade. Japan on the other
hand, has for a long time not been remotely near another economy of its
size. The emergence of China is changing this, and thus Japan as well will
most likely begin to trade more.
Given this situation, economic partnership agreements (EPAs) and FTAs will
continue to be vitally important to Japan. Japan will also want to advance
regional integration if it is to remain successful. APEC, ASEAN, and the
TPP are likely to become even more influential in the Asia-Pacific.
Alongside the increasing importance of regional integration will most likely
be the increasing importance of emerging economies. Looking at the activities
of the IMF as an example, it was once the case that most of the money from
the IMF was used to maintain economic stability in developed nations. Since
the 1980s, the majority of IMF funding has gone from developed nations
to developing nations. It is likely that in the future as well the world
is going to see increases in the amount of FDI going from rich to emerging
nations and, alongside this, the emergence of the latter as stronger economic
powers.
|
|
The completion of an international terminal at Tokyo International Airport
is of extreme significance. The opening of air routes between local metropolitan
airports was once a mere dream. The Japanese government has been discussing
for a long time the creation of an open sky policy in the Asia-Pacific,
but this has not happened yet. The EU and North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) have open skies, and ASEAN is now working hard for this as well,
but there is as of yet no prospect of an open sky initiative throughout
Asia. Removing barriers to air travel would likely be extremely beneficial
to the region and lead to more integrated economic activity. Tokyo International
Airport is just the first step. There are nearly 100 airports in Asia;
it is time they be connected.
A meeting participant asked what the prospects for China and Japan increasing
their trade levels were, given the diplomatic troubles that had occurred
between the two. Prof. Itoh answered that the ban China had imposed on
the export of rare earth materials to Japan did not bode well for trade
between the two nations. He also commented that agricultural issues were
a frequent point of argument which would probably not be resolved soon.
Even if these issues were not resolved, Prof. Itoh continued, Japan would
want to proceed with increased exports to the United States and other Asian
nations. He stressed that, although China was important, other economies
were equally important partners for Japan.
|